4.2 Article

Dynamic Hemodynamic Energy Loss in Normal and Stenosed Aortic Valves

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4000874

关键词

aortic valve; fluid mechanics; aortic valve stenosis; power loss

资金

  1. Tom and Shirley Gurley
  2. NHLBI [HL70262-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aortic valve (AV) stenosis, if untreated, leads to heart failure. From a mechanics stand. point, heart failure can be interpreted as the failure of the heart to generate sufficient power to overcome energy losses in the circulation. Thus, energy efficiency-based measures for evaluating AV performance and disease severity have the advantage of being a direct measure of the contribution of the AV hydrodynamic characteristics toward heart failure. We present a new method for computing the rate of energy dissipation as a function of systolic time, by, modifying the Navier-Stokes momentum equation. This method preserves the dynamic term of the Navier-Stokes momentum equation, and allows the investigation of the trend of the rate of energy dissipation over time. This method is applied to a series of in vitro experiments, where a trimmed porcine valve is exposed to various conditions: varying stroke volumes (50 ml to 90 ml) at the fixed heart rate; varying heart rates (60-80 beats/min) at fixed stroke volume; and varying stenosis levels (normal, mild stenosis, moderate stenosis). The results are: (1) energy dissipation waveform has a distinctive pattern of being skewed toward late systole, due to flow instabilities during deceleration phases: (2) increasing heart rate and stroke volume increases energy, dissipation, but the normalized shape of the energy dissipation waveform is preserved across heart rates and stroke volumes; (3) increasing stenosis level increases energy dissipation, and also alters the normalized shape of the energy dissipation waveform. Since stenosis produces a signature energy dissipation waveform shape, dynamic energy dissipation analysis can potentially be extended into a clinical tool for AV evaluation. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4000874]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据