4.2 Article

Disrupted Reproduction, Estrous Cycle, and Circadian Rhythms in Female Mice Deficient in Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 355-369

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748730414549767

关键词

vasoactive intestinal peptide; reproduction; estrous cycle; circadian rhythms; female; mouse; ovulation

资金

  1. Iris-Cantor Women's Health Center at UCLA
  2. NIH training grant from the Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology [T32 HD 07228-26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The female reproductive cycle is gated by the circadian timing system and may be vulnerable to disruptions in the circadian system. Prior work suggests that vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-expressing neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are one pathway by which the circadian clock can influence the estrous cycle, but the impact of the loss of this peptide on reproduction has not been assessed. In the present study, we first examine the impact of the genetic loss of the neuropeptide VIP on the reproductive success of female mice. Significantly, mutant females produce about half the offspring of their wild-type sisters even when mated to the same males. We also find that VIP-deficient females exhibit a disrupted estrous cycle; that is, ovulation occurs less frequently and results in the release of fewer oocytes compared with controls. Circadian rhythms of wheel-running activity are disrupted in the female mutant mice, as is the spontaneous electrical activity of dorsal SCN neurons. On a molecular level, the VIP-deficient SCN tissue exhibits lower amplitude oscillations with altered phase relationships between the SCN and peripheral oscillators as measured by PER2-driven bioluminescence. The simplest explanation of our data is that the loss of VIP results in a weakened SCN oscillator, which reduces the synchronization of the female circadian system. These results clarify one of the mechanisms by which disruption of the circadian system reduces female reproductive success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据