4.2 Article

Acute Effects of Bright Light Exposure on Cortisol Levels

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 208-216

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748730410368413

关键词

circadian rhythm; biological clock; diurnal; circadian phase; adrenal gland

资金

  1. NIH [R01-MH45130, R01-HL081761]
  2. General Clinical Research Center, GCRC-M01-RR-02635 from the National Center for Research Resources [GCRC-M01-RR-02635]
  3. Biological Sciences Initiative at the University of Colorado-Boulder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multisynaptic neural and endocrine pathways from the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus have been hypothesized to communicate circadian and photic information to the adrenal glands. In humans, light exposure has been reported to have no effect, increase, or decrease cortisol levels. These inconsistent findings in humans may be related to differences among studies including the intensity (similar to 500 to 5500 lux), duration (15 min to 4 h), and circadian phase of light exposure. The authors assessed the influence of exposure to bright light on cortisol levels in humans during the rising and descending phases of the circadian rhythm of cortisol, that is, when cortisol levels are high. Twenty healthy men and women were studied using a within-subject research design. Subjects were studied in an environment free of time cues for 9 to 10 days. Subjects received a 6.7-h exposure of bright light (similar to 10,000 lux; equivalent to ambient light intensity just after sunrise or just before sunset) or dim light (similar to 3 lux; equivalent to candlelight) during the biological night and morning. Bright light exposure significantly reduced plasma cortisol levels at both circadian phases studied, whereas dim light exposure had little effect on cortisol levels. The finding of an acute suppressive effect of bright light exposure on cortisol levels supports the existence of a mechanism by which photic information can acutely influence the human adrenal glands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据