4.6 Article

Degradation of Tiam1 by Casein Kinase 1 and the SCFβTrCP Ubiquitin Ligase Controls the Duration of mTOR-S6K Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 289, 期 40, 页码 27400-27409

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.575571

关键词

E3 Ubiquitin Ligase; Proteasome; Proteolysis; Signal Transduction; Ubiquitin; Tiam1; betaTrCP; mTOR-S6K Signaling

资金

  1. Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)
  2. Dutch Cancer Society (KWF)
  3. Cancer Genomics Centre
  4. European Union under Marie Curie Actions
  5. Netherlands Proteomics Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The guanine nucleotide exchange factor Tiam1 regulates the activity of the small GTPase Rac1, a crucial regulator of cell adhesion, proliferation, and survival. Results: The SCFTrCP ubiquitin ligase in cooperation with CK1 targets Tiam1 for proteasome-dependent degradation. Conclusion: Tiam1 degradation is required to terminate the mTOR-S6K signaling pathway. Significance: Tiam1 degradation controls the duration of mTOR-S6K signaling in response to mitogens. Tiam1 (T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that specifically controls the activity of the small GTPase Rac, a key regulator of cell adhesion, proliferation, and survival. Here, we report that in response to mitogens, Tiam1 is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system via the SCFTrCP ubiquitin ligase. Mitogenic stimulation triggers the binding of Tiam1 to the F-box protein TrCP via its degron sequence and subsequent Tiam1 ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. The proteolysis of Tiam1 is prevented by TrCP silencing, inhibition of CK1 and MEK, or mutation of the Tiam1 degron site. Expression of a stable Tiam1 mutant that is unable to interact with TrCP results in sustained activation of the mTOR/S6K signaling and increased apoptotic cell death. We propose that the SCFTrCP-mediated degradation of Tiam1 controls the duration of the mTOR-S6K signaling pathway in response to mitogenic stimuli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据