4.6 Article

Recognition of the Thomsen-Friedenreich Pancarcinoma Carbohydrate Antigen by a Lamprey Variable Lymphocyte Receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 288, 期 32, 页码 23597-23606

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.480467

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI036900, AI083892]
  2. NIH, NCI
  3. National Science Foundation [MCB-0614672]
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1050582] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variable lymphocyte receptors (VLRs) are leucine-rich repeat proteins that mediate adaptive immunity in jawless vertebrates. VLRs were recently shown to recognize glycans, such as the tumor-associated Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (TF alpha; Gal beta 1-3GalNAc alpha), with a selectivity rivaling or exceeding that of lectins and antibodies. To understand the basis for TF alpha recognition by one such VLR (VLRB.aGPA.23), we measured thermodynamic parameters for the binding interaction and determined the structure of the VLRB.aGPA.23-TF alpha complex to 2.2 angstrom resolution. In the structure, four tryptophan residues form a tight hydrophobic cage encasing the TF alpha disaccharide that completely excludes buried water molecules. This cage together with hydrogen bonding of sugar hydroxyls to polar side chains explains the exquisite selectivity of VLRB.aGPA.23. The topology of the glycan-binding site of VLRB.aGPA.23 differs markedly from those of lectins or antibodies, which typically consist of long, convex grooves for accommodating the oligosaccharide. Instead, the TF alpha disaccharide is sandwiched between a variable loop and the concave surface of the VLR formed by the beta-strands of the leucine-rich repeat modules. Longer oligosaccharides are predicted to extend perpendicularly across the beta-strands, requiring them to bend to match the concavity of the VLR solenoid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据