4.6 Article

Expression in Drosophila of Tandem Amyloid β Peptides Provides Insights into Links between Aggregation and Neurotoxicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 287, 期 24, 页码 20748-20754

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.350124

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [G0700990]
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. MRC [G0901786, G0700990, MC_G1000734] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-SRF2010-2] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700990, MC_G1000734, G0901786] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation and subsequent aggregation of amyloid beta (A beta) peptides play a crucial initiating role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). The two main isoforms of these peptides have 40 (A beta(40)) or 42 residues (A beta(42)), the latter having a higher propensity to aggregate in vitro and being the main component of the plaques observed in vivo in AD patients. We have designed a series of tandem dimeric constructs of these A beta peptides to probe the manner in which changes in the aggregation kinetics of A beta affect its deposition and toxicity in a Drosophila melanogaster model system. The levels of insoluble aggregates were found to be substantially elevated in flies expressing the tandem constructs of both A beta(40) and A beta(42) compared with the equivalent monomeric peptides, consistent with the higher effective concentration, and hence increased aggregation rate, of the peptides in the tandem repeat. A unique feature of the A beta(42) constructs, however, is the appearance of highlevels of soluble oligomeric aggregates and a corresponding dramatic increase in their in vivo toxicity. The toxic nature of the A beta(42) peptide in vivo can therefore be attributed to the higher kinetic stability of the oligomeric intermediate states that it populates relative to those of A beta(40) rather than simply to its higher rate of aggregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据