4.6 Article

Lysine 624 of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) Is a Critical Determinant of Amyloid β Peptide Length SUPPORT FOR A SEQUENTIAL MODEL OF γ-SECRETASE INTRAMEMBRANE PROTEOLYSIS AND REGULATION BY THE AMYLOID β PRECURSOR PROTEIN (APP) JUXTAMEMBRANE REGION

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 46, 页码 39804-39812

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274696

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG20206, AG29886, AG032362, NS069289]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

gamma-Secretase is a multiprotein intramembrane cleaving aspartyl protease (I-CLiP) that catalyzes the final cleavage of the amyloid beta precursor protein (APP) to release the amyloid beta peptide (A beta). A beta is the primary component of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and its mechanism of production has been studied intensely. gamma-Secretase executes multiple cleavages within the transmembrane domain of APP, with cleavages producing A beta and the APP intracellular domain (AICD), referred to as gamma and epsilon, respectively. The heterogeneous nature of the gamma cleavage that produces various A beta peptides is highly relevant to AD, as increased production of A beta 1-42 is genetically and biochemically linked to the development of AD. We have identified an amino acid in the juxtamembrane region of APP, lysine 624, on the basis of APP695 numbering (position 28 relative to A beta) that plays a critical role in determining the final length of A beta peptides released by gamma-secretase. Mutation of this lysine to alanine (K28A) shifts the primary site of gamma-secretase cleavage from 1-40 to 1-33 without significant changes to epsilon cleavage. These results further support a model where epsilon cleavage occurs first, followed by sequential proteolysis of the remaining transmembrane fragment, but extend these observations by demonstrating that charged residues at the luminal boundary of the APP transmembrane domain limit processivity of gamma-secretase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据