4.6 Article

Bim Protein Degradation Contributes to Cisplatin Resistance

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 25, 页码 22384-22392

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.239566

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gail Purtan Ovarian Cancer Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cisplatin is the first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of several cancers. However, the development of cisplatin resistance represents a major clinical problem, and the mechanisms of acquired resistance are not fully understood. Here we show that degradation of the Bcl-2 homology 3-only proapoptotic protein Bim plays an important role in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Specifically, we show that treatment of ovarian cancer cells with cisplatin caused Bim phosphorylation and subsequent degradation and that its degradation is associated with cisplatin resistance. We also show that cisplatin treatment caused the activation of ERK, which correlated with Bim phosphorylation and degradation. By inhibiting ERK phosphorylation with the MEK inhibitor and knocking down ERK expression with siRNA, we show that Bim phosphorylation and degradation were blocked, which suggests that Bim is phosphorylated by ERK and that such phosphorylation is responsible for cisplatin-induced Bim degradation. We show that ERK was activated in cisplatin-resistant OV433 cells as compared with their counterpart parental OV433 cells. We also show that Bim was phosphorylated and degraded in cisplatin-resistant OV433 cells but not in the parental OV433 cells. Importantly, we show that inhibition of Bim degradation by the proteasome inhibitor MG132 sensitized resistant OV433 cells to cisplatin-induced death. Taken together, our data indicate that degradation of Bim via ERK-mediated phosphorylation can lead to cisplatin resistance. Therefore, these findings suggest that cisplatin resistance can be overcome by the combination of cisplatin and the proteasome inhibitors in ovarian cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据