4.6 Article

Tn Glycosylation of the MUC6 Protein Modulates Its Immunogenicity and Promotes the Induction of Th17-biased T Cell Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 286, 期 10, 页码 7797-7811

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.209742

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut Pasteur [PIC-PTR 278, PTR 262, DARRI 27237]
  2. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  3. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale Union
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  5. Vasand and Kusum Joshi
  6. Comision Honoraria de Lucha contra el Cancer (Uruguay)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tn antigen (alpha-GalNAc-O-Ser/Thr) is one of the most specific human cancer-associated structures. This antigen, together with mucins, the major carriers of O-glycosylated tumor antigens in adenocarcinomas, are being evaluated as anticancer immunotherapeutic targets. In particular, the MUC6 protein, which is normally expressed only in gastric tissues, has been detected in intestinal, pulmonary, colorectal, and breast carcinomas. To develop anti-cancer vaccines based on the Tn antigen, we produced MUC6 proteins with different Tn density by using mixtures of recombinant ppGalNAc-T1, -T2, and -T7. The obtained glycoproteins were characterized and analyzed for their immunological properties, as compared with the non-glycosylated MUC6. We show that these various MUC6: Tn glycoproteins were well recognized by both MUC6 and Tn-specific antibodies. However, Tn glycosylation of the MUC6 protein strongly affected their immunogenicity by partially abrogating Th1 cell responses, and promoting IL-17 responses. Moreover, the non-glycosylated MUC6 was more efficiently presented than MUC6:Tn glycoproteins to specific T CD4(+) hybridomas, suggesting that Tn glycosylation may affect MUC6 processing or MHC binding of the processed peptides. In conclusion, our results indicate that Tn glycosylation of the MUC6 protein strongly affects its B and T cell immunogenicity, and might favor immune escape of tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据