4.6 Article

Repeated Domains of Leptospira Immunoglobulin-like Proteins Interact with Elastin and Tropoelastin

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 29, 页码 19380-19391

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004531

关键词

-

资金

  1. Harry M. Zweig Memorial Fund
  2. New York State Science and Technology Foundation
  3. Biotechnology Research and Development Corp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leptospira spp., the causative agents of leptospirosis, adhere to components of the extracellular matrix, a pivotal role for colonization of host tissues during infection. Previously, we and others have shown that Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins (Lig) of Leptospira spp. bind to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and fibrinogen. In this study, we report that Leptospira can be immobilized by human tropoelastin (HTE) or elastin from different tissues, including lung, skin, and blood vessels, and that Lig proteins can bind to HTE or elastin. Moreover, both elastin and HTE bind to the same LigB immunoglobulin-like domains, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7'-8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12 as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and competition ELISAs. The LigB immunoglobulin-like domain binds to the 17th to 27th exons of HTE (17-27HTE) as determined by ELISA ( LigBCon4, K-D = 0.50 mu M; LigBCen7'-8, K-D = 0.82 mu M; LigBCen9, K-D = 1.54 mu M; and LigBCen12, K-D = 0.73 mu M). The interaction of LigBCon4 and 17-27HTE was further confirmed by steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (K-D = 0.49 mu M) and ITC (K-D = 0.54 mu M). Furthermore, the binding was enthalpy-driven and affected by environmental pH, indicating it is a charge-charge interaction. The binding affinity of LigBCon4D341N to 17-27HTE was 4.6-fold less than that of wild type LigBCon4. In summary, we show that Lig proteins of Leptospira spp. interact with elastin and HTE, and we conclude this interaction may contribute to Leptospira adhesion to host tissues during infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据