4.3 Article

Erythropoietin for the Repair of Cerebral Injury in Very Preterm Infants (EpoRepair)

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 198-204

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000437248

关键词

Brain damage; Children; Neurology; Development; Drug

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [33CM30_140334]
  2. Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research in Zurich, Switzerland
  3. Hartmann Muller Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Hermann Klaus Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland
  5. Olga Mayenfisch Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland
  6. Anna-Muller-Grocholsky Foundation in Zurich, Switzerland
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [33CM30_140334] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Preterm infants suffering from intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. Observational data suggest that recombinant human erythropoietin (rEPO) improves long-term cognitive outcome in infants with IVH. Recent studies revealed a beneficial effect of early high-dose rEPO on white matter development in preterm infants determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Objectives: To summarize the current evidence and to delineate the study protocol of the EpoRepair trial (Erythropoietin for the Repair of Cerebral Injury in Very Preterm Infants). Methods: The study involves a review of the literature and the design of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of repetitive high-dose rEPO administration, enrolling 120 very preterm infants with moderate-to-severe IVH diagnosed by cranial ultrasound in the first days of life, qualitative and quantitative MRI at term-equivalent age and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up until 5 years of age. Results and Conclusions: The hypothesis generated by observational data that rEPO may improve long-term cognitive outcomes of preterm infants suffering from IVH are to be confirmed or refuted by the randomized controlled trial, EpoRepair. (C) 2015 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据