4.6 Article

Structural Basis for the Recognition of Oxidized Phospholipids in Oxidized Low Density Lipoproteins by Class B Scavenger Receptors CD36 and SR-BI

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 7, 页码 4447-4454

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.082800

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL053315, HL077213, 2P01HL073311-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific oxidized phospholipids (oxPC(CD36)) accumulate in vivo at sites of oxidative stress and serve as high affinity ligands for scavenger receptors class B (CD36 and SR-BI). Recognition of oxPC(CD36) by scavenger receptors plays a role in several pathophysiological processes. The structural basis for the recognition of oxPC(CD36) by CD36 and SR-BI is poorly understood. A characteristic feature of oxPC(CD36) is an sn-2 acyl group that incorporates a terminal gamma-hydroxy (or oxo)-alpha,beta-unsaturated carbonyl. In the present study, a series of model oxidized phospholipids were designed, synthesized, and tested for their ability to serve as ligands for CD36 and SR-BI. We demonstrated that intact the sn-1 hydrophobic chain, the sn-3 hydrophilic phosphocholine or phosphatidic acid group, and the polar sn-2 tail are absolutely essential for high affinity binding. We further found that a terminal negatively charged carboxylate at the sn-2 position suffices to generate high binding affinity to class B scavenger receptors. In addition, factors such as polarity, rigidity, optimal chain length of sn-2, and sn-3 positions and negative charge at the sn-3 position of phospholipids further modulate the binding affinity. We conclude that all three positions of oxidized phospholipids are essential for the effective recognition by scavenger receptors class B. Furthermore, the structure of residues in these positions controls the affinity of the binding. The present studies suggest that, in addition to oxPC(CD36), other oxidized phospholipids observed in vivo may represent novel ligands for scavenger receptors class B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据