4.6 Article

Alternative Translation Initiation Generates Cytoplasmic Sheep Prion Protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 29, 页码 19668-19678

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.003566

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Torsted's Fund for Animal Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytoplasmic localization of the prion protein (PrP) has been observed in different species and cell types. We have investigated this poorly understood phenomenon by expressing fusion proteins of sheep prion protein and green fluorescent protein ((PrP)-Pr-GFP) in N2a cells, with variable sequence context surrounding the start codon Met(1). (PrP)-Pr-GFP expressed with the wild-type sequence was transported normally through the secretory pathway to the cell surface with acquisition of N-glycan groups, but two N-terminal fragments of (PrP)-Pr-GFP were detected intracellularly, starting in frame from Met(17). When (PrP)-Pr-GFP was expressed with a compromised Kozak sequence ((PrP)-Pr-GFP*), dispersed intracellular fluorescence was observed. A similar switch from pericellular to intracellular PrP localization was seen when analogous constructs of sheep PrP, without inserted GFP, were expressed, showing that this phenomenon is not caused by the GFP tag. Western blotting revealed a reduction in glycosylated forms of (PrP)-Pr-GFP*, whereas the N-terminal fragments starting from Met(17) were still present. Formation of these N-terminal fragments was completely abolished when Met(17) was replaced by Thr, indicating that leaky ribosomal scanning occurs for normal sheep PrP and that translation from Met(17) is the cause of the aberrant cytoplasmic localization observed for a fraction of the protein. In contrast, the same phenomenon was not detected upon expression of similar constructs for mouse PrP. Analysis of samples from sheep brain allowed immunological detection of N-terminal PrP fragments, indicating that sheep PrP is subject to similar processing mechanisms in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据