4.6 Article

Cysteine Mutagenesis Reveals Transmembrane Residues Associated with Charge Translocation in Prestin

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 5, 页码 3103-3113

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.053249

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. NIDCD [R01 DC009622, DC00354]
  3. National Institutes of Health, NIDCD [R21 DC008134]
  4. National Science Foundation [044379]
  5. National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation [BES 0321275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solute carrier transmembrane protein prestin (SLC26A5) drives an active electromechanical transduction process in cochlear outer hair cells that increases hearing sensitivity and frequency discrimination in mammals. A large intramembraneous charge movement, the nonlinear capacitance (NLC), is the electrical signature of prestin function. The transmembrane domain (TMD) helices and residues involved in the intramembrane charge displacement remain unknown. We have performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis with serine or valine replacement to investigate the importance of cysteine residues to prestin structure and function. The distribution of oligomeric states and membrane abundance of prestin was also probed to investigate whether cysteine residues participate in prestin oligomerization and/or NLC. Our results reveal that 1) Cys-196 (TMD 4) and Cys-415 (TMD 10) do not tolerate serine replacement, and thus maintaining hydrophobicity at these locations is important for the mechanism of charge movement; 2) Cys-260 (TMD 6) and Cys-381 (TMD 9) tolerate serine replacement and are probably water-exposed; and 3) if disulfide bonds are present, they do not serve a functional role as measured via NLC. These novel findings are consistent with a recent structural model, which proposes that prestin contains an occluded aqueous pore, and we posit that the orientations of transmembrane domain helices 4 and 10 are essential for proper prestin function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据