4.6 Article

Cleaved serpin refolds into the relaxed state via a stressed conformer

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 25, 页码 17568-17578

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M709262200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serine proteinase inhibitors (serpins) are believed to fold in vivo into a metastable stressed state with cleavage of their P1-P1' bond resulting in reactive center loop insertion and a thermostable relaxed state. To understand this unique folding mechanism, we investigated the refolding processes of the P1-P1'-cleaved forms of wild type ovalbumin (cl-OVA) and the R339T mutant (cl-R339T). In the native conditions, cl-OVA is trapped as the stressed conformer, whereas cl-R339T attains the relaxed structure. Under urea denaturing conditions, these cleaved proteins completely dissociated into the heavy (Gly(1)-Ala(352)) and light (Ser(353)-Pro(385)) chains. Upon refolding, the heavy chains of both proteins formed essentially the same initial burst refolding intermediates and then reassociated with the light chain counterparts. The reassociated intermediates both refolded into the native states with indistinguishable kinetics. The two refolded proteins, however, had a notable difference in thermostability. cl-OVA refolded into the stressed form with T-m = 68.4 degrees C, whereas cl-R339T refolded into the relaxed form with T-m = 85.5 degrees C. To determine whether cl-R339T refolds directly to the relaxed state or through the stressed state, conformational analyses by anion-exchange chromatography and fluorescence measurements were executed. The results showed that cl-R339T refolds first to the stressed conformation and then undergoes the loop insertion. This is the first demonstration that the P1-P1'-cleaved serpin peptide capable of loop insertion refolds to the stressed conformation. This highlights that the stressed conformation of serpins is an inevitable intermediate state on the folding pathway to the relaxed structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据