4.6 Article

Oligomerization Status Directs Overall Activity Regulation of the Escherichia coli Class Ia Ribonucleotide Reductase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 51, 页码 35310-35318

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M806738200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Kempe Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is a key enzyme for the synthesis of the four DNA building blocks. Class Ia RNRs contain two subunits, denoted R1 (alpha) and R2 (beta). These enzymes are regulated via two nucleotide-binding allosteric sites on the R1 subunit, termed the specificity and overall activity sites. The specificity site binds ATP, dATP, dTTP, or dGTP and determines the substrate to be reduced, whereas the overall activity site binds dATP (inhibitor) or ATP. By using gas-phase electrophoretic mobility macromolecule analysis and enzyme assays, we found that the Escherichia coli class Ia RNR formed an inhibited alpha(4)beta(4) complex in the presence of dATP and an active alpha(2)beta(2) complex in the presence of ATP (main substrate: CDP), dTTP (substrate: GDP) or dGTP (substrate: ADP). The R1-R2 interaction was 30-50 times stronger in the alpha(4)beta(4) complex than in the alpha(4)beta(4) complex, which was in equilibrium with free alpha(2) and beta(2) subunits. Studies of a known E. coli R1 mutant (H59A) showed that deficient dATP inhibition correlated with reduced ability to form alpha(4)beta(4) complexes. ATP could also induce the formation of a generally inhibited alpha(4)beta(4) complex in the E. coli RNR but only when used in combination with high concentrations of the specificity site effectors, dTTP/dGTP. Both allosteric sites are therefore important for alpha(4)beta(4) formation and overall activity regulation. The E. coli RNR differs from the mammalian enzyme, which is stimulated by ATP also in combination with dGTP/dTTP and forms active and inactive alpha(6)beta(2) complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据