4.6 Article

Reversibility, Equilibration, and Fidelity of Strand Exchange Reaction between Short Oligonucleotides Promoted by RecA Protein from Escherichia coli and Human Rad51 and Dmc1 Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 3, 页码 1495-1504

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M800612200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate the reversibility of RecA-promoted strand exchange reaction between short oligonucleotides in the presence of adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate). The reverse reaction proceeds without the dissociation of RecA from DNA. The reaction reaches equilibrium and its yield depends on the homology between the reaction substrates. We estimate the tolerance of the RecA-promoted strand exchange to individual base substitutions for a comprehensive set of possible base combinations in a selected position along oligonucleotide substrates for strand exchange and find, in agreement with previously reported estimations, that this tolerance is higher than in the case of free DNA. It is demonstrated that the short oligonucleotide-based approach can be applied to the human recombinases Rad51 and Dmc1 when strand exchange is performed in the presence of calcium ions and ATP. Remarkably, despite the commonly held belief that the eukaryotic recombinases have an inherently lower strand exchange activity, in our system their efficiencies in strand exchange are comparable with that of RecA. Under our experimental conditions, the human recombinases exhibit a significantly higher tolerance to interruptions of homology due to point base substitutions than RecA. Finding conditions where a chemical reaction is reversible and reaches equilibrium is critically important for its thermodynamically correct description. We believe that the experimental system described here will substantially facilitate further studies on different aspects of the mechanisms of homologous recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据