4.6 Article

Active-site mapping of a Populus xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase with a library of xylogluco-oligosaccharides

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 32, 页码 21853-21863

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M803058200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Restructuring the network of xyloglucan (XG) and cellulose during plant cell wall morphogenesis involves the action of xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases (XETs). They cleave the XG chains and transfer the enzyme-bound XG fragment to another XG molecule, thus allowing transient loosening of the cell wall and also incorporation of nascent XG during expansion. The substrate specificity of a XET from Populus (PttXET16-34) has been analyzed by mapping the enzyme binding site with a library of xylogluco-oligosaccharides as donor substrates using a labeled heptasaccharide as acceptor. The extended binding cleft of the enzyme is composed of four negative and three positive subsites (with the catalytic residues between subsites -1 and + 1). Donor binding is dominated by the higher affinity of the XXXGmoiety (G = Glc beta(1 -> 4) and X = Xyl alpha(1 -> 6)Glc beta(1 -> 4)) of the substrate for positive subsites, whereas negative subsites have a more relaxed specificity, able to bind (and transfer to the acceptor) a cello-oligosaccharyl moiety of hybrid substrates such as GGGGXXXG. Subsite mapping with k(cat)/K-m values for the donor substrates showed that a GG-unit on negative and-XXG on positive subsites are the minimal requirements for activity. Subsites -2 and -3 (for backbone Glc residues) and +2' (for Xyl substitution at Glc in subsite +2) have the largest contribution to transition state stabilization. GalGXXXGXXXG (Gal = Gal beta(1 -> 4)) is the best donor substrate with a blocked nonreducing end that prevents polymerization reactions and yields a single transglycosylation product. Its kinetics have unambiguously established that the enzyme operates by a ping-pong mechanism with competitive inhibition by the acceptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据