4.5 Article

The relative importance of space compared to topography increases from rare to common tree species across latitude

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 2520-2532

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13420

关键词

alpha and beta diversity; community assembly; CTFS-ForestGEO; Niche and neutral; Scale; variation partitioning

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB31000000, KSCX2-EW-Z, KZCX2-EW-Z-5]
  2. West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Foundation of Tropical Forest Dynamics Study Project Based on Forest Dynamics Plot System [CAFYBB2011004]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2015FB185]
  5. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB954100]
  6. Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2016CASSEABRIQG002]
  7. National Science Foundation of China [31061160188]
  8. QCAS Biotechnology Fund [GJHZ1130]
  9. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2008BAC39B02]
  10. Applied Fundamental Research Foundation of Yunnan Province [2014GA003]
  11. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570380, 31300358, 31100312, 31470490, 41371078]
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1545761] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Understanding how spatial distributions of rare and common species are associated with environmental and spatial processes is essential to understanding community assembly. We addressed the following questions: (a) does the relative importance of space and topography vary from rare to common tree species? (b) Are the contributions of topography and space equal? (c) Are the variances explained by topography or space correlated with elevational ranges (ER) at the local scale? (d) Does cell-size influence those postulated associations? Location Major taxa studied China and the Americas. Tree species. Methods Results We partitioned the variation in species richness and composition of rare and common tree species by topography and space across a range of extents and grain sizes in eight communities. We calculated contribution ratio (CR) between space and topography to quantify their relative importance. We employed Kendall's rank correlation to determine the relation between CR and commonness. Mixed effect models were used to identify the influence of cell-size on the results. The majority of CR values were positively related to increasing commonness, especially for composition. The explained variances by space were always higher than that by topography regardless of commonness. At local scale, variances explained by space or topography were not correlated with ER. Main conclusions Our results indicate that the relative importance of space compared to topography increases from rare to common species across forests. We suggest that future studies of community assembly need to account for both space and topography to adequately describe differences in rare and common species assembly mechanisms at range of spatial extents and grain sizes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据