4.5 Article

Variability in thermal and UV-B energy fluxes through time and their influence on plant diversity and speciation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 1630-1644

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02102.x

关键词

Diversification; evolutionary rates; mutagenesis; palaeoecology; plant diversity; speciation; thermal energy; ultraviolet radiation; UV-B

资金

  1. Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C510667/1, NE/G010730/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/G010730/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Throughout Earth's history there have been temporal and spatial variations in the amount of visible and ultraviolet radiation received by ecosystems. This paper examines if temporal changes in these forms of energy receipt could have influenced the tempo and mode of plant diversity and speciation, focusing in particular upon Cenozoic time-scales. Evidence for changing patterns of plant diversity and speciation apparent in various fossil records and molecular phylogenies are considered alongside calculated changes in thermal and solar ultraviolet energy (specifically UV-B) over the past 50 Myr. We suggest that changes in thermal energy influx (amount and variability) affected the tempo of evolution through its influence upon community dynamics (e.g. population size, diversity, turnover, extinctions). It was not only the amount of thermal energy but also variability in its flux that may have influenced these processes, and ultimately the rate of diversification. We suggest that variations in UV-B would have influenced the mode and tempo of speciation through changes to genome stability during intervals of elevated UV-B. We argue, therefore, that although variability in thermal energy and UV-B fluxes through time may lead to the same end-point (changing the rate of diversification), the processes responsible are very different and both need to be considered when linking evolutionary processes to energy flux.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据