4.2 Article

Amyloid Formation by the Model Protein Muscle Acylphosphatase is Accelerated by Heparin and Heparan Sulphate Through a Scaffolding-based Mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 146, 期 6, 页码 805-814

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvp128

关键词

amyloidosis; biological polymers; extracellular matrix; glycosaminoglycan; protein folding and aggregation

资金

  1. Italian Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca [PRIN 2006058958, FIRB RBNE03PX83]
  2. European Union
  3. European Molecular Biology Organization Young Investigator Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid formation is the hallmark of many diseases. The propensity of a protein to aggregate depends on a number of biological factors like the presence of sulphated polysaccharides termed as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Here we assessed whether the polymeric nature of GAGs is responsible for their protein aggregation-promoting effect. We studied the effect of different monosaccharide derivatives, featuring the main characteristics of heparin and heparan sulphate (HS) building blocks, on the aggregation kinetics of human muscle acylphosphatase (mAcP), a useful model protein for these studies. We observed that while heparin and HS changed the mAcP aggregation kinetic profile, the monosaccharide derivatives had no effect, whatever their concentration could be and both when they are studied separately or in combination. In contrast, heparin fragments with six or more monosaccharides reproduced the effects of HS and in part those of heparin. We conclude that the effect of heparin and HS on protein aggregation arises from the clustering and regular distribution of their composing units on a polymeric structure. We propose a model in which heparin and HS promote mAcP aggregation through a scaffolding-based mechanism, in which the regularly spaced sulphate moieties of the polymer interact with mAcP molecules increasing their local concentration and facilitating their orientation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据