4.4 Article

The ldhA Gene, Encoding Fermentative L-Lactate Dehydrogenase of Corynebacterium glutamicum, Is under the Control of Positive Feedback Regulation Mediated by LldR

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 13, 页码 4251-4258

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00303-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corynebacterium glutamicum ldhA encodes L-lactate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme that couples L-lactate production to reoxidation of NADH formed during glycolysis. We previously showed that in the absence of sugar, SugR binds to the ldhA promoter region, thereby repressing ldhA expression. In this study we show that LldR is another protein that binds to the ldhA promoter region, thus regulating ldhA expression. LldR has hitherto been characterized as an L-lactate-responsive transcriptional repressor of L-lactate utilization genes. Transposon mutagenesis of a reporter strain carrying a chromosomal ldhA promoter-lacZ fusion (PldhA-lacZ) revealed that ldhA disruption drastically decreased expression of PldhA-lacZ. PldhA-lacZ expression in the ldhA mutant was restored by deletion of lldR, suggesting that LldR acts as a repressor of ldhA in the absence of L-lactate and the LldR-mediated repression is not relieved in the ldhA mutant due to its inability to produce L-lactate. lldR deletion did not affect PldhA-lacZ expression in the wild-type background during growth on either glucose, acetate, or L-lactate. However, it upregulated PldhA-lacZ expression in the sugR mutant background during growth on acetate. The binding sites of LldR and SugR are located around the -35 and -10 regions of the ldhA promoter, respectively. C. glutamicum ldhA expression is therefore primarily repressed by SugR in the absence of sugar. In the presence of sugar, SugR-mediated repression of ldhA is alleviated, and ldhA expression is additionally enhanced by LldR inactivation in response to L-lactate produced by LdhA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据