4.7 Article

The critical role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and FXR activation in immune-mediated liver injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 55-66

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.02.010

关键词

Autoimmunity; FXR activation; Lymphoid subpopulations; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170380, 81325002, 81100271]
  2. Program of Shanghai Innovative Research Team in Immunity of Non-viral Liver Diseases
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [12XD1403300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immunobiology of FXR has attracted significant attention in immune regulation and innate immunity. We have studied the mechanism of action of FXR activation on two models of acute hepatitis, inflammation mediated by Con A and alpha-GalCer and focused on the interactions of FXR activation and expression of PIR-B, both in vivo and in vitro using luciferase reporter and CHIP assays. In addition, based upon our data, we studied the role of FXR activation on the immunobiology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Importantly, we report herein that FXR activation reduces the inflammatory insult induced by either alpha-GalCer or Con A; such treatment expands CD11b(+)Ly6C(+) MDSCs. The protective effect of FXR activation is dependent on expansion of MDSCs, particularly liver CD11b(+)Ly6C(high) cells. Indeed, FXR activation enhances the suppressor function of MDSCs through upregulation of PIR-B by binding the PIR-B promoter. FXR activation drives the accumulation of MDSCs to liver through upregulation of S100A8. FXR activation facilitates homing and function of MDSCs, which function as a critical negative feedback loop in immune-mediated liver injury. The novel mechanisms defined herein emphasize not only the importance of liver lymphoid subpopulations, but also the potential roles of modulating FXR in autoimmune liver disease. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据