4.4 Article

Lectin-Like Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-1 Plays an Important Role in Vascular Inflammation in Current Smokers

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 585-590

出版社

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.16436

关键词

Smoking; Inflammation; LOX-1

资金

  1. National Hospital Organization
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25893300] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Smoking induces vascular inflammation and increases the risk of cardiovascular events. Lectinlike oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) is a scavenger receptor that is induced by oxidative stress and is associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation and destabilization. LOX-1 interacts with C-reactive protein (CRP) and plays an important role in inflammatory diseases. We therefore hypothesized that LOX-1 may be involved in the onset of smoking-induced vascular inflammation. Methods: We measured the soluble LOX-1 (sLOX-1) levels in sera obtained from 207 current smokers. Results: The serum sLOX-1 levels positively correlated with various smoking variables, such as the number of cigarettes smoked per day (r = 0.150, p < 0.05), the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations (r = 0.198, p < 0.005) and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence scores (r = 0.190, p < 0.01). The serum levels of sLOX-1 also correlated with those of a representative inflammatory marker, the serum high-sensitivity CRP level (hsCRP; r = 0.232, p < 0.005). A multivariate regression analysis revealed the independent determinants of the serum sLOX-1 level to be the expired air CO concentration (beta = 0.182, p < 0.05) and the hsCRP level (beta = 0.213, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The serum sLOX-1 level was found to increase in close association with both the smoking-related variables and the inflammatory marker hsCRP. These findings suggest that LOX-1 may therefore play an important role in the onset of smoking-induced inflammation and atherosclerosis in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据