4.4 Article

Relationships between Plasma Fatty Acid Composition and Coronary Artery Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 99-107

出版社

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.5876

关键词

Coronary heart disease; Eicosapentaenoic acid; Docosahexaenoic acid; Lipoprotein

资金

  1. Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS) was the first prospective randomized clinical trial to demonstrate prevention of coronary events by pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between various plasma fatty acid concentrations and the risk of coronary events in JELIS participants. Methods: In 15,534 participants, we calculated the hazard ratio for major coronary events (sudden cardiac death, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, and angioplasty/stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting) relative to the on-treatment average level of plasma fatty acids with the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: As a result of EPA intervention, the plasma EPA concentration increased, but the docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration did not. The other fatty acids measured decreased slightly. The higher plasma level of EPA (hazard ratio = 0.83, p = 0.049, in all participants and hazard ratio = 0.71, p = 0.018, in the EPA intervention group), but not of DHA, was inversely associated with the risk of major coronary events. The associations between other fatty acids and the risk of major coronary events were not significant. In all JELIS participants, the risk of major coronary events was significantly decreased (20%) in the group with high (150 mu g/mL or more) on-treatment plasma EPA concentration compared with that in the low (less than 87 mu g/mL) group. Conclusion: The risk of coronary artery disease is influenced by variations in plasma fatty acid composition. Among n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA and DHA exhibited differences in the correlation with the risk of major coronary events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据