4.5 Article

Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of perfluorooctanesulfonate in the Anuran, Silurana tropicalis

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 365-374

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3727

关键词

developmental toxicity; endocrine disruption; gonad differentiation; perfluorooctanesulfonate; PFOS; S. tropicalis

资金

  1. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [6552]
  2. SC Johnson Son

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 150-day post-metamorphosis (dpm) partial lifecycle study exposing Silurana tropicalis to <0.03 (control), 0.06, 0.13 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/L perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) was conducted. A subset of specimens from the control and each treatment were evaluated at metamorphic completion. A significant increase in the median metamorphosis time was observed in the 1.0 mg/L PFOS treatment relative to the control. A modest increase in the occurrence, but not severity, of mild follicular hypertrophy was found in thyroid glands from organisms exposed to the 0.62 and 1.1 mg/L PFOS treatments. At 150 dpm, a concentration-dependent increase in whole body PFOS residues was measured ranging from 29.6 to 163.5 mg/kg in the 0.05 and 1.1 mg/L PFOS treatments. Decreased body weight and snout-vent length were noted in specimens exposed to 1.1 mg PFOS/L at the completion of metamorphosis. Body weight was reduced in the 1.1 mg/L PFOS concentration; however, snout-vent length was not affected by PFOS exposure at 150 dpm. An increased proportion of phenotypic males were noted in the 0.62 and 1.1 mg/L PFOS treatments. Abnormal ovary development characterized by size asymmetry, necrosis and formation of excessive fibrous connective tissue was identified in females exposed to 0.29 and 1.1 mg PFOS/L. Asymmetrically misshaped testes were found at 1.1 mg/L PFOS. Results suggested that PFOS is capable of interfering with S. tropicalis growth before metamorphic completion and growth and gonad development during juvenile development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据