4.6 Article

Effects of accelerated aging and compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene and poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) blends

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 2, 页码 1032-1037

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.37504

关键词

polymer blends; compatibility; mechanical property; morphology; accelerated aging

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-2010-0012831]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of maleic anhydride-grafted styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene copolymer (SEBS-g-MAH) on the mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP) and poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) (ABS) blends were investigated. Based on mechanical properties, including impact and tensile strengths, the PP/ABS (70/30) blends containing SEBS-g-MAH showed improved impact strength with minimal loss of tensile strength. As determined from morphological studies of the PP/ABS blends, addition of SEBS-g-MAH decreased PP/ABS blend droplet size more than the addition of SEBS. Additionally, the effects of SEBS-g-MAH and SEBS on the mechanical and morphological properties of the PP/ABS (70/30) blends were investigated during accelerated aging in an oven at 90 degrees C for 72 h (one cycle). The impact strength of the PP/ABS (70/30) blends with SEBS-g-MAH (7 phr) decreased less than 10% after five cycles, but blends with SEBS (7 phr) and blends without compatibilizer decreased as much as 37%. The tensile strengths of the PP/ABS (70/30) blends after accelerated aging indicated a trend similar to that of the impact strength. The morphological studies indicated no significant changes in the PP/ABS (70/30) blends with SEBS-g-MAH; however, many cavities and damages were observed in the blend with SEBS. The above results suggest that SEBS-g-MAH acts as an impact modifier and as a good compatibilizer in the PP/ABS (70/30) blends. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据