4.5 Article

Acute change of titin at mid-sarcomere remains despite 8 wk of plyometric training

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 11, 页码 1512-1519

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00420.2013

关键词

Z-disk streaming; calpain; eccentric exercise; acute bouts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate skeletal muscle changes induced by an acute bout of plyometric exercise (PlyEx) both before and after PlyEx training, to understand if titin is affected differently after PlyEx training. Healthy untrained individuals (N = 11) completed the 1stPlyEx (10 X 10 squat-jumps, 1-min rest). Thereafter, six subjects completed 8 wk of PlyEx, while five controls abstained from any jumping activity. Seven days after the last training session, all subjects completed the 2ndPlyEx. Blood samples were collected before and 6 h and 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after each acute bout of PlyEx, and muscle biopsies 4 days before and 3 days after each acute bout of PlyEx. The 1stPlyEx induced an increase in circulating myoglobin concentration. Muscle sample analysis revealed Z-disk streaming, a stretch or a fragmentation of titin (immunogold), and increased calpain-3 autolysis. After training, 2ndPlyEx did not induce Z-disk streaming or calpain-3 activation. The previously observed post-1stPlyEx positional change of the titin COOH terminus was still present pre-2ndPlyEx, in all trained and all control subjects. Only two controls presented with Z-disk streaming after 2ndPlyEx, while calpain-3 activation was absent in all controls. Eccentric explosive exercise induced a stretch or fragmentation of titin, which presented as a positional change of the COOH terminus. Calpain-3 activation does not occur when titin is already stretched before explosive jumping. Enzymatic digestion results in titin fragmentation, but since an increase in calpain-3 autolysis was visible only after the 1stPlyEx acute bout, fragmentation cannot explain the prolonged positional change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据