4.5 Article

Cerebral vasoreactivity during hypercapnia is reset by augmented sympathetic influence

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 2, 页码 352-358

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00802.2010

关键词

cerebral blood flow velocity; cerebral tissue oxygenation; cerebral vascular conductance; lower-body negative pressure; partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01-HL-65613]
  2. Government Scholarship from the People's Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sympathetic nerve activity influences cerebral blood flow, but it is unknown whether augmented sympathetic nerve activity resets cerebral vasoreactivity to hypercapnia. This study tested the hypothesis that cerebral vasodilation during hypercapnia is restrained by lower-body negative pressure (LBNP)-stimulated sympathoexcitation. Cerebral hemodynamic responses were assessed in nine healthy volunteers inverted right perpendicularage 25 yr (SD 3)inverted left perpendicular during rebreathing-induced increases in partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) at rest and during LBNP. Cerebral hemodynamic responses were determined by changes in flow velocity of middle cerebral artery (MCAV) using transcranial Doppler sonography and in regional cerebral tissue oxygenation (ScO2) using near-infrared spectroscopy. PETCO2 values during rebreathing were similarly increased from 41.9 to 56.5 mmHg at rest and from 40.7 to 56.0 mmHg during LBNP of -15 Torr. However, the rates of increases in MCAV and in ScO2 per unit increase in PETCO2 (i.e., the slopes of MCAV/PETCO2 and ScO2/PETCO2) were significantly (P <= 0.05) decreased from 2.62 +/- 0.16 cm.s(-1).mmHg(-1) and 0.89 +/- 0.10%/mmHg at rest to 1.68 +/- 0.18 cm.s(-1).mmHg(-1) and 0.63 +/- 0.07%/mmHg during LBNP. In conclusion, the sensitivity of cerebral vasoreactivity to hypercapnia, in terms of the rate of increases in MCAV and in ScO2, is diminished by LBNP-stimulated sympathoexcitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据