4.5 Article

Improved predictive models for plasma glucose estimation from multi-linear regression analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 155-160

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91657.2008

关键词

breath analysis; exhaled gases; hyperglycemia; intravenous glucose tolerance test

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [1-2006-76]
  2. NIH [MO1-RR00827-28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lee J, Ngo J, Blake DB, Meinardi S, Pontello AM, Newcomb R, Galassetti PR. Improved predictive models for plasma glucose estimation from multi-linear regression analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds. J Appl Physiol 107: 155-160, 2009. First published May 7, 2009; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91657.2008.-Exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) represent ideal biomarkers of endogenous metabolism and could be used to noninvasively measure circulating variables, including plasma glucose. We previously demonstrated that hyperglycemia in different metabolic settings (glucose ingestion in pediatric Type 1 diabetes) is paralleled by changes in exhaled ethanol, acetone, and methyl nitrate. In this study we integrated these gas changes along with three additional VOCs (2 forms of xylene and ethylbenzene) into multi-linear regression models to predict plasma glucose profiles in 10 healthy young adults, during the 2 h following an intravenous glucose bolus (matched samples of blood, exhaled and room air were collected at 12 separate time points). The four-gas model with highest predictive accuracy estimated plasma glucose in each subject with a mean R value of 0.91 (range 0.70-0.98); increasing the number of VOCs in the model only marginally improved predictions (average R with best 5-gas model = 0.93; with 6-gas model = 0.95). While practical development of this methodology into clinically usable devices will require optimization of predictive algorithms on large-scale populations, our data prove the feasibility and potential accuracy of breath-based glucose testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据