4.8 Article

DNA methylome analysis in Burkitt and follicular lymphomas identifies differentially methylated regions linked to somatic mutation and transcriptional control

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 1316-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3413

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) [01KU1002A-J, 036166B]
  2. European Union [HEALTH-F5-2011-282510]
  3. KinderKrebsInitiative Buchholz/Holm-Seppensen
  4. LIFE (Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases), Leipzig University
  5. European Union
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  7. European Social Fund (ESF)
  8. Free State of Saxony
  9. NGFNplus (BMBF) [01GS0883]
  10. DKFZ-Heidelberg Center for Personalized Oncology (DKFZ-HIPO)
  11. Dr. Werner Jackstadt Foundation [S134-10.100]
  12. MMML by the Deutsche Krebshilfe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although Burkitt lymphomas and follicular lymphomas both have features of germinal center B cells, they are biologically and clinically quite distinct. Here we performed whole-genome bisulfite, genome and transcriptome sequencing in 13 IG-MYC translocation-positive Burkitt lymphoma, nine BCL2 translocation-positive follicular lymphoma and four normal germinal center B cell samples. Comparison of Burkitt and follicular lymphoma samples showed differential methylation of intragenic regions that strongly correlated with expression of associated genes, for example, genes active in germinal center dark-zone and light-zone B cells. Integrative pathway analyses of regions differentially methylated in Burkitt and follicular lymphomas implicated DNA methylation as cooperating with somatic mutation of sphingosine phosphate signaling, as well as the TCF3-ID3 and SWI/SNF complexes, in a large fraction of Burkitt lymphomas. Taken together, our results demonstrate a tight connection between somatic mutation, DNA methylation and transcriptional control in key B cell pathways deregulated differentially in Burkitt lymphoma and other germinal center B cell lymphomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据