4.6 Article

Static and dynamic magnetic behavior of nanocrystalline and nanocomposites of (Mn0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4)(1-z)(SiO2)z (z=0.0, 0.10, 0.15, 0.25)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 108, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3499644

关键词

-

资金

  1. DST, Government of India [SR/S2/CMP-43/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocrystalline and nanocomposites of (Mn0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4)((1-z))(SiO2)(z) (z=0.0, 0.10, 0.15, 0.25) were prepared by sol-gel method. The as-prepared samples were annealed at 200, 400, and 600 degrees C. The crystallographic phases, particle sizes and their distributions, etc. of the annealed samples were determined by x-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Zero field cooled (ZFC) and field cooled (FC) magnetizations of some selected samples measured in the temperature range of 300-5 K suggest the presence of superparamagnetic (SPM) relaxation in the samples. For a few selected samples particle sizes were also estimated from the TEM micrographs and dc magnetizations. The particle sizes, magnetic anisotropies and blocking temperatures of some samples have also been computed from the difference of FC and ZFC magnetizations data. The particle sizes of the samples were also worked out from the Langevin fitting of the anhysteretic magnetization curve above the blocking temperature. The SPM relaxations of all the samples have also been confirmed by ac magnetic measurements. The SPM relaxations in the nanocomposite samples annealed at higher temperature (600 degrees C) is stronger than the bare sample which is attributed to the controlled rate of growth of particle sizes by SiO2 coating. In case of sample annealed at 400 degrees C, the value of magnetic anisotropy constant determined from the ZFC and FC magnetizations is in agreement with that obtained from the Neel's equation. However it is a bit smaller for the sample annealed at 600 degrees C. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3499644]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据