4.6 Article

Electrically and magnetically tunable phase shifters based on a barium strontium titanate-yttrium iron garnet layered structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3486463

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research
  2. Division Of Materials Research
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [906489] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the tuning of permittivity and permeability of a ferroelectric/ferromagnetic bilayer structure which can be used as a microwave phase shifter with two degrees of tuning freedom. The structure was prepared by the growth of a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) layer on a gadolinium gallium garnet substrate by liquid phase epitaxy, the growth of a barium strontium titanate (BST) layer on the YIG layer through pulsed laser deposition, and then the fabrication of a coplanar waveguide on the top of BST through e-beam evaporation and trilayer liftoff techniques. The phase shifters exhibit a differential phase shift of 38 degrees/cm at 6 GHz through permittivity tuning under an applied electric field of similar to 75 kV/cm and a static magnetic field of 1700 Oe. By tuning the permeability through the applied magnetic field we increase the differential phase shift to 52 degrees/cm and simultaneously obtain a better match to the zero applied electric field condition, resulting in an improvement in the return loss from 22.4 to 24.9 dB. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of a lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate (PMN-PT) layer to tune the permeability of the YIG layer. This tuning relies on the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive effects of PMN-PT and YIG, respectively. Tuning of the ferromagnetic response through strain and magnetostriction as opposed to applied magnetic field can potentially pave the way for low power consumption, continuously and rapidly tunable, impedance matched phase shifters. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3486463]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据