4.6 Article

Structural, electrical, and magnetic properties of chemical solution deposited BiFe1-xTixO3 and BiFe0.9Ti0.05Co0.05O3 thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3158556

关键词

bismuth compounds; crystal structure; ferroelectricity; ferromagnetism; grain growth; insulating thin films; iron compounds; leakage currents; liquid phase deposition; magnetic hysteresis; platinum; silicon; silicon compounds; space charge; surface roughness; titanium compounds

资金

  1. DOE [DE-FG02-08ER46526]
  2. Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing [NSF-0531171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BiFeO3 (BFO), BiFe1-xTixO3, and BiFe0.9Ti0.05Co0.05O3 thin films were deposited on Pt/TiO2/SiO2/Si substrates by chemical solution deposition. BFO film has distorted rhombohedral R-3c structure and in BiFe1-xTixO3 (104)/(110) reflections broadened suggesting limited grain growth with Ti substitution. The surface roughness (rms) decreased in the case of Ti substituted BFO. Up to 5% Ti in the lattice reduces the leakage current substantially. For BiFe1-xTixO3, the leakage current qualitatively followed the same trend and the behavior resembles to space charge limited current conduction. The magnetic properties were completely lost by Ti substitution and slightly recovered upon cosubstitution with magnetically active Co. The disappearance of ferromagnetic hysteresis of BFO with Ti substitution and its reappearance with Co is suggestive of the origin of magnetic properties consequential from the BFO lattice itself and hence support it as an intrinsic property of BFO. Capacitance-voltage characteristics of BFO, BiFe0.95Ti0.05O3, and BiFe0.9Ti0.05Co0.05O3 showed butterfly loop indicating ferroelectric property at room temperature as well as at low temperature. However, saturated polarization-voltage hysteresis was not observed in all cases and BiFe0.9Ti0.05Co0.05O3 films showed very poor ferroelectricity compared to BFO and BiFe0.95Ti0.05O3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据