4.6 Article

Degradation of biogenic amines by vineyard ecosystem fungi. Potential use in winemaking

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 112, 期 4, 页码 672-682

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05243.x

关键词

biogenic amines; fungi; grapevine; molecular characterization; wine safety

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation [AGL2009-13361-C02-00, AGL2006-04514, CSD2007-00063]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [ALIBIRD P2009/AGR-1469]
  3. FPI-MICINN
  4. JAE-CSIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To evaluate the ability of grapevine ecosystem fungi to degrade histamine, tyramine and putrescine in synthetic medium and in wines. Methods and Results: Grapevine and vineyard soil fungi were isolated from four locations of Spain and were subsequently identified by PCR. A total of 44 fungi were evaluated for in vitro amine degradation in a microfermentation system. Amine degradation by fungi was assayed by reversed-phase (RP)HPLC. All fungi were able to degrade at least two different primary amines. Species of Pencillium citrinum, Alternaria sp., Phoma sp., Ulocladium chartarum and Epicoccum nigrum were found to exhibit the highest capacity for amine degradation. In a second experiment, cell-free supernatants of P. citrinum CIAL-274,760 (CECT 20782) grown in yeast carbon base with histamine, tyramine or putrescine, were tested for their ability to degrade amines in three different wines (red, white and synthetic). The highest levels of biogenic amine degradation were obtained with histamine-induced enzymatic extract. Conclusion: The study highlighted the ability of grapevine ecosystem fungi to degrade biogenic amines and their potential application for biogenic amines removal in wine. Significance and Impact of Study: The fungi extracts described in this study may be useful in winemaking to reduce the biogenic amines content of wines, thereby preventing the possible adverse effects on health in sensitive individuals and the trade and export of wine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据