4.6 Article

Enhanced biofilm formation and 3-chlorobenzoate degrading activity by the bacterial consortium of Burkholderia sp NK8 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 790-800

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04027.x

关键词

Biodegradation; biofilm; Burkholderia sp; NK8; chlorobenzoate; consortium; Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [19780242]
  2. Tokyo University of Agriculture [pAG408]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19780242] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To characterize biofilm formation of a chlorobenzoates (CBs) degrading bacterium, Burkholderia sp. NK8, with another bacterial species, and the biodegradation activity against CBs in the mixed-species biofilm. Burkholderia sp. NK8 was solely or co-cultured with each of five other representative bacteria in microtitre dishes. Biofilm formation involving the strain NK8 was synergistically promoted by co-culturing with only Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Epifluorescent microscopy revealed that cells of the bacterial strain NK8 were viable and distributed randomly in the mixed-species biofilms. Enumeration of the attached cells on the surface of wells revealed that cells of the strain NK8 increased approx. 10-fold by the co-culture with the strain PAO1 compared to those by monoculture of the strain NK8, and the degradation activity of 3-chlorobenzoate by the dual-species biofilms was more promoted than that by the strain NK8-monocultured biofilms. Enhanced biofilm formation of Burkholderia sp. NK8 by the bacterial consortium occurred, but is determined by the partner bacterial species. The mixed-species biofilms have the advantage to degrade CBs on a solid surface. This study provides a significance of bacterial consortia on the biofilm formation and the degradation activity of Burkholderia sp. NK8, which contribute for complete degradation of chlorinated aromatics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据