4.5 Software Review

X plus : a comprehensive computationally accelerated structure analysis tool for solution X-ray scattering from supramolecular self-assemblies

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 1522-1531

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0021889810032772

关键词

microtubules; lipid membranes; line-shape analysis; form-factor analysis; structure-factor analysis; background analysis; fitting-error analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X+ is a user-friendly multi-core accelerated program that fully analyses solution X-ray scattering radially integrated images. This software is particularly useful for analysing supramolecular self-assemblies, often found in biology, and for reconstructing the scattering signal in its entirety. The program enables various ways of subtracting background noise. The user selects a geometric model and defines as many layers of that shape as needed. The thickness and electron density of each layer are the fitting parameters. An initial guess is input by the user and the program calculates the form-factor parameters that best fit the data. The polydispersity of one size parameter at a time can be taken into account. The program can then address the assembly of those shapes into different lattice symmetries. This is accounted for by fitting the parameters of the structure factor, using various peak line shapes. The models of the program and selected features are presented. Among them are the model-fitting procedure, which includes both absolute and relative constraints, data smoothing, signal decomposition for separation of form and structure factors, goodness-of-fit verification procedures, error estimation, and automatic feature recognition in the data, such as correlation peaks and baseline. The program's intuitive graphical user interface runs on Windows PCs. Using X+, the exact structure of a microtubule in a crowded environment, and the structure, domain size, and elastic and interaction parameters of lipid bilayers, were obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据