4.7 Article

Impact of qnrA1, qnrB1 and qnrS1 on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in an experimental pneumonia model caused by Escherichia coli with or without the GyrA mutation Ser83Leu

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 1609-1615

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt063

关键词

Enterobacteriaceae; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; mouse model

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [06/0580, 11/00934]
  2. Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa of the Junta de Andalucia [P07-CTS-02908]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  4. European Regional Development Fund A way to achieve Europe ERDF, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD06/0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of qnrA1, qnrB1 and qnrS1 on the in vivo efficacies of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in an experimental model of pneumonia caused by Escherichia coli. Two isogenic groups of E. coli transformants, based on two ATCC 25922 strains, with or without the GyrA mutation Ser83Leu, and carrying qnrA1, qnrB1 or qnrS1, were used in an experimental pneumonia model. The efficacies of ciprofloxacin (40 mg/kg/day) and levofloxacin (50 and 150 mg/kg/day) were evaluated. For the pneumonia caused by the parental strains lacking qnr genes, both fluoroquinolones significantly (P0.05) reduced the bacterial lung concentration by 7 log(10) cfu/g against E. coli ATCC/pBK and between 5.09 and 6.34 log(10) cfu/g against E. coli ATCC-S83L/pBK. The presence of any qnr genes in the strains of both isogenic groups diminished the reduction of bacterial lung concentration with any therapy (P0.05). Furthermore, all therapeutic schemes reduced the percentage of positive blood cultures in both isogenic groups (P0.05). Finally, the survival results suggest a higher mortality with the strains expressing qnr genes. The presence of qnrA1, qnrB1 and qnrS1 in E. coli reduced the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in a murine pneumonia model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据