4.7 Article

10-Fold increase (200611) in the rate of healthy subjects with extended-spectrum -lactamase-producing Escherichia coli faecal carriage in a Parisian check-up centre

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 562-568

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks429

关键词

SHV-12; CTX-M; E; coli dominant population; clones ST131; ST69; ST10

资金

  1. la Direction de la Recherche Clinique Ile-de-France [PAS07010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2006, 0.6 of healthy subjects living in the Paris area had extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli in their gut. To assess the evolution of this rate, a study identical to that of 2006 was conducted in 2011. Healthy adults who visited the IPC check-up centre in FebruaryMarch 2011 and agreed to participate, provided stools and answered a questionnaire on the visit day. Stools were analysed to detect ESBL producers and to isolate the dominant E. coli population. ESBLs were molecularly characterized. For the subjects harbouring ESBL-producing E. coli, the phylogenetic group and sequence type (ST) were determined for both ESBL-producing and dominant E. coli isolates. PFGE profiles were also determined when two types of isolates had the same ST. Among the 345 subjects included, 21 (6) had ESBL-producing E. coli faecal carriage. None of the previously published risk factors was identified. CTX-M accounted for 86 and SHV-12 for 14. Dominant and ESBL-producing E. coli were similarly distributed into phylogenetic groups (A, 5248; B1, 5; B2, 2414; and D, 1933). Dominant and ESBL-producing E. coli displayed a polyclonal structure (18 STs each). However, ST10 and ST131 were identified in dominant and ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from different subjects. Most (20/21) ESBL producers were subdominant and belonged (16/21) to STs different from that of the corresponding dominant E. coli. The 10-fold increase in the rate of healthy subjects with ESBL-producing E. coli faecal carriage over a 5 year period suggests wide dissemination of these isolates in the Parisian community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据