4.7 Article

Reutericyclin and related analogues kill stationary phase Clostridium difficile at achievable colonic concentrations

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 66, 期 8, 页码 1773-1776

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr201

关键词

anti-C. difficile; stationary phase; probiotic metabolite; reutericyclins

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [ARRA R01AI079653, CA21765]
  2. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The stationary phase of Clostridium difficile, which is associated with the symptoms of the diarrhoeal disease, is refractory to antibiotic killing. The aim of this study was to explore whether probiotic-derived reutericyclin and related synthetic analogues could kill stationary phase C. difficile at concentrations achievable in the gastrointestinal tract. Methods: The bactericidal activities of reutericyclin and lead compound derivatives were examined against logarithmic and stationary phase cultures of different C. difficile strains. The absorption of compounds across the intestinal epithelia was tested using the Caco-2 permeability model. Results: Unlike vancomycin and metronidazole, reutericyclins demonstrated concentration-dependent killing, being rapidly bactericidal against both logarithmic and stationary phase cells, at low concentrations (0.09-2 mg/L). The intestinal absorption of unmodified reutericyclin was poor and comparable to that of vancomycin. However, this property varied significantly for the synthetic reutericyclin analogues, ranging from well absorbed to non-absorbed. The non-absorbable compounds were highly effluxed, suggesting this parameter could be modulated to obtain agents with superior efficacy. Conclusions: Reutericyclins showed excellent potency against the lethal non-growing stage of C. difficile at concentrations that may be attained in the gastrointestinal tract. Since these agents represent novel potential treatments for C. difficile infection, further development of this compound class is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据