4.7 Article

Introduction of OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae to Israeli hospitals by medical tourism

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 66, 期 12, 页码 2763-2766

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr382

关键词

conjugation; plasmids; carbapenemases

资金

  1. European Commission [241796]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The carbapenemase OXA-48 has been reported from different Mediterranean countries. It is mostly encoded on a single plasmid in various Enterobacteriaceae species. We characterized the epidemiological and molecular features of OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae (OPE) in Israel. Methods: Epidemiological investigation was conducted by the National Center for Infection Control. Genotyping was performed using multilocus sequence typing. The bla(OXA-48)-carrying plasmids were investigated using S1 endonuclease and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Conjugation efficiency of the bla(OXA-48)-carrying plasmids was studied in a filter mating experiment. Results: Since 2007, four OPE-infected patients were identified, all non-Israeli (two Palestinian, one Jordanian and one Georgian). Three had prior hospitalization; two in Jordan and one in Georgia. The bla(OXA-48) gene was detected in three Escherichia coli strains belonging to different clonal complexes, one Klebsiella oxytoca and one Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 101, as previously reported from Tunisia and Spain. In all isolates, the bla(OXA-48) gene was located inside Tn1999.2 and was carried on a 60 kb plasmid with an identical RFLP pattern. The plasmid was able to conjugate from Klebsiella spp. to E. coli, and had a conjugation efficiency up to similar to 10000 times higher than that of pKpQIL. Conclusions: OPE, introduced mainly by medical tourism, are an emerging threat to patients from affected Mediterranean countries. The blaOXA-48-carrying plasmid demonstrated remarkable conjugation efficiency, which is probably important in the success of its dissemination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据