4.7 Article

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of daptomycin during continuous venovenous haemodialtration

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 977-983

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr551

关键词

renal replacement therapy; antimicrobial therapy; acute renal failure

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. Novartis
  3. Janssen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Daptomycin is bactericidal against Gram-positive bacteria, with peak-dependent effect but trough-dependent toxicity. This study was performed to develop dosing recommendations in continuous venovenous haemodialtration (CVVHDF). Nine critically ill patients in intensive care units of the Medical University Hospital of Vienna, requiring CVVHDF due to acute renal failure and antimicrobial treatment, were included. Blood and effluent samples were collected over 72 h to determine daptomycin concentrations by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were based on 10 sampling timepoints during the first 24 h, and peak and trough samples thereafter. An open two-compartment model was fitted to each subjects plasma concentrationtime data. Simulations of serum concentrationtime profiles after different doses and intervals were performed using ADAPT 5. Peak plasma concentrations with 6 mg/kg daptomycin were 62.216.2, 66.117.3 and 78.522.1 mg/L on days 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The total clearance was 6.14.9 mL/min, and the elimination half-life was 17.89.7 h. Daptomycin was filtrated and could therefore be measured in the effluent. Protein binding was lower than that seen in healthy volunteers. The unbound fraction was 164.5. All subjects maintained trough serum concentrations above 4 mg/L, at which relevant pathogens are considered daptomycin-susceptible. Accumulation resulted when daptomycin was given every 24 h. Simulation of 8 mg/kg daptomycin given every 48 h resulted in adequate levels without accumulation. We recommend 8 mg/kg daptomycin every 48 h in patients on CVVHDF and therapeutic drug monitoring, if possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据