4.5 Article

Hydrogen Sulfide Protects Amyloid-beta Induced Cell Toxicity in Microglia

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 1189-1200

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101002

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; hydrogen sulfide; microglia; neuroprotection

资金

  1. Singapore National Medical Research Council [1183/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is pathologically characterized by the accumulation of senile plaques, containing activated microglia and amyloid-beta peptides (A beta). We found that aggregated A beta(1-40) peptide (25 mu M, 24 h) significantly decreased viability of BV-2 microglial cells. This was concentration-dependently attenuated by NaHS (a hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor, 25-500 mu M). NaHS also significantly attenuated A beta-induced LDH release and the up-regulation of protein expression of growth arrest DNA damage (GADD 153). These data suggest that H2S may attenuate A beta-induced cell toxicity and cell cycle re-entry. Pretreatment with NaHS also suppressed the release of nitric oxide and the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase. These effects were attenuated by exogenous application of NaHS or stimulation of endogenous generation of H2S with S-adenosyl-L-methionine, a cystathionine beta synthase activator. NaHS also decreased the releases of TNF-alpha and suppressed the up-regulation of protein expression of cyclooxygenase 2, which were mimicked by blockade of p38 and JNK-MAPK. In addition, A beta induced loss of mitochondrial member potential (Delta Psi m) and activation of p38-, JNK-, and ERK-MAPKs. Application of NaHS attenuated these effects but failed to affect the activation of ERK. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that H2S may protect cell against A beta-induced cell injury by inhibition of inflammation, promotion of cell growth and preservation of mitochondrial function in a p38- and JNK-MAPK dependent manner. Our results suggest that H2S may have potential therapeutic value for treatment of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据