4.5 Article

Extracellular Amyloid-beta and Cytotoxic Glial Activation Induce Significant Entorhinal Neuron Loss in Young PS1(M146L)/APP(751SL) Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 755-776

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1192

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; entorhinal cortex; microglia; neurodegeneration; neuroinflammation; transgenic

资金

  1. Spanish grants [PI060556, PI060567, PI060781]
  2. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS)-Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. Junta de Andalucia [CVI-902]
  4. CIBERNED
  5. Junta de Andalucia
  6. MEC of Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we demonstrated that extracellular, not intracellular, amyloid-beta (A beta) and the associated cytotoxic glial neuroinflammatory response are major contributors to early neuronal loss in a PS1xAPP model. A significant loss of principal (27%) and SOM/NPY (56-46%) neurons was found in the entorhinal cortex at 6 months of age. Loss of principal cells occurred selectively in deep layers (primarily layer V) whereas SOM/NPY cell loss was evenly distributed along the cortical column. Neither layer V pyramidal neurons nor SOM/NPY interneurons displayed intracellular A beta immunoreactivity, even after formic acid retrieval; thus, extracellular factors should be preferentially implicated in this selective neurodegeneration. Amyloid deposits were mainly concentrated in deep layers at 4-6 months, and of relevance was the existence of a potentially cytotoxic inflammatory response (TNF alpha, TRAIL, and iNOS mRNAs were upregulated). Moreover, non-plaque associated activated microglial cells and reactive astrocytes expressed TNF alpha and iNOS, respectively. At this age, in the hippocampus of same animals, extracellular A beta induced a non-cytotoxic glial activation. The opposite glial activation, at the same chronological age, in entorhinal cortex and hippocampus strongly support different mechanisms of disease progression in these two regions highly affected by A beta pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据