4.7 Article

The effects of hydrothermal temperature on structural and photocatalytic properties of ordered large pore size TiO2-SiO2 mesostructured composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 72-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.051

关键词

Oxide materials; Chemical synthesis; Photocatalytic properties; Mesoporous materials

资金

  1. SIRIM Bhd
  2. Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ordered TiO2-SiO2 mesoporous materials with BJH pore diameters in the range from 12 to 15 nm were synthesized by a one-step hydrothermal synthesis method. In this route, tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) in a low pH solution were used as SiO2 and TiO2 precursor, respectively with P123 as a template and hexane as a micelle expander in the presence of NH4F. In this work, we show the effect of different hydrothermal temperatures (70 degrees C and 130 degrees C) on pore structure and photocatalytic efficiency of the materials prepared. The synthesized materials were characterized by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), N-2 adsorption-desorption experiments, X ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The method could produce ordered mesoporous structure with uniform pore size of 12-15 nm and high specific surface areas S-BET up to 431 m(2)/g. The photocatalytic activity of the samples was evaluated by degradation of MB under UV light irradiation and results showed these mesostructure materials have much higher photocatalytic efficiency in comparison with commercial P25 titania. The results also show that for materials synthesized using higher hydrothermal temperature (130 degrees C) resulting in increased in photocatalytic activity due to higher formation of anatase phase and more open channels by comparison with lower hydrothermal treatment (70 degrees C). (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据