4.7 Article

Development and validation of the Composite Asthma Severity Index-an outcome measure for use in children and adolescents

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 694-701

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.962

关键词

Asthma; composite score; morbidity; treatment; exacerbations; symptoms; severity

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [NO1-AI-25496, NO1-JAI-25482]
  2. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [RR00052, M01RR00533, 1UL1RR025771, M01RR00071, 1UL1RR024156, 5UL1RR024992-02, 5M01RR020359-04]
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS
  6. NIAID
  7. NIH
  8. Environmental Protection Agency
  9. Novartis
  10. NIAID/NHLBI/NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Asthma severity is reflected in many aspects of the disease, including impairment and future risks, particularly for exacerbations. According to the Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, however, to assess more comprehensively the severity of asthma the level of current treatment needed to maintain a level of control should be included. Objective: Development and validation of a new instrument, the Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI), which can quantify disease severity by taking into account impairment, risk, and the amount of medication needed to maintain control. At present, there is no instrument available to measure and assess the multidimensional nature of asthma. Methods: Twenty-six established asthma investigators, who are part of the National Institutes of Health-supported Inner City Asthma Consortium, participated in a modified Delphi consensus process to identify and weight the dimensions of asthma. Factor analysis was performed to identify independent domains of asthma by using the Asthma Control Evaluation trial. CASI was validated by using the Inner City Anti-IgE Therapy for Asthma trial. Results: CASI scores include 5 domains: day symptoms and albuterol use, night symptoms and albuterol use, controller treatment, lung function measures, and exacerbations. At Asthma Control Evaluation trial enrollment, CASI ranged from 0 to 17, with a mean of 6.2. CASI was stable, with minimal change in variance after 1 year of treatment. In external validation, CASI detected a 32% larger improvement than did symptoms alone. Conclusion: CASI retained its discriminatory ability even with low levels of symptoms reported after months of guidelines-directed care. Thus, CASI has the ability to determine the level of asthma severity and provide a composite clinical characterization of asthma. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 694-701.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据