4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Drug hypersensitivity: Pharmacogenetics and clinical syndromes

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 S60-S66

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.046

关键词

Drug hypersensitivity; drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome; Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis; pharmacogenetics; severe cutaneous adverse reaction; abacavir; nevirapine; carbamazepine; allopurinol

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P30 AI110527, R01 AI060460-01, R01 AI060460] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions include syndromes such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). An important advance has been the discovery of associations between HLA alleles and many of these syndromes, including abacavir-associated hypersensitivity reaction, allopurinol-associated DRESS/DIHS and SJS/TEN, and SJS/TEN associated with aromatic amine anticonvulsants. These HLA associations have created the promise for prevention through screening and have additionally shed further light on the immunopathogenesis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions. The rollout of HLA-B*5701 into routine clinical practice as a genetic screening test to prevent abacavir hypersensitivity provides a translational roadmap for other drugs. Numerous hurdles exist in the widespread translation of several other drugs, such as carbamazepine, in which the positive predictive value of HLA-B*1502 is low and the negative predictive value of HLA-B*1502 for SJS/TEN might not be 100% in all ethnic groups. International collaborative consortia have been formed with the goal of developing phenotypic standardization and undertaking HLA and genome-wide analyses in diverse populations with these syndromes. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:S60-6.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据