4.7 Article

Co-delivery of doxorubicin and PEGylated C16-ceramide by nanoliposomes for enhanced therapy against multidrug resistance

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 2033-2050

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/NNM.15.50

关键词

cancer nanotechnology; glucosylceramide synthase; molecular biomaterials; multidrug resistance; nanomedicine; pharmaceutical nanotechnology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472829, 81402512]
  2. Shanghai Young Rising Star of Science [12QB1402400]
  3. Shanghai Chen'guang Scholar Funding, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 program project) [2012AA020809]
  4. Shanghai Chen'guang Scholar Funding, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (863 program project) [2012AA020809]
  5. National Key Project for Infectious Diseases [2012ZX10002012-009]
  6. Pudong New Area Science and Technology Commission of Ministry of Education of China (Key Laboratory)
  7. Ministry of Education of China (Key Laboratory)
  8. Shanghai Commission of Education
  9. National Special Projects for New Drug Development and Infectious Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To develop novel nanoliposomes (Lip-ADR-Cer) codelivering doxorubicin (ADR) and PEGylated C16 ceramide (PEG-ceramide C16) to overcome multidrug resistance. Materials & methods: The antitumor activity and mechanism of Lip-ADR-Cer were evaluated. Results & conclusion: The IC50 of Lip-ADR-Cer after 48-h treatment with the MCF-7/ADR and HL-60/ADR cancer cells, both being ADR resistant, was 2.2-and 1.4-fold effective respectively versus the general nanoliposomes with no PEG-ceramide C16 (Lip-ADR). The antitumor assay in mice bearing MCF-7/ADR or HL-60/ADR xenograft tumors confirmed the superior antitumor activity of Lip-ADR-Cer over Lip-ADR. We found that the improved therapeutic effect of Lip-ADR-Cer may be attributed to both of the cytotoxic effect of PEG-ceramide C16 and glucosylceramide synthase overexpression in multidrug resistance cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据