4.7 Article

High doses of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 124, 期 6, 页码 1229-1234

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.025

关键词

Asthma; pregnancy; inhaled corticosteroids; congenital malformations; cohort study

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although reassuring data exist on the use of low-to-moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) during pregnancy, there are inadequate data for women receiving high doses. Objective: To investigate the association between doses of ICS during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among women with asthma. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of 13,280 pregnancies of women with asthma (1990-2002) by linking 3 administrative databases from Quebec (Canada). By using generalized estimation equation models, we compared women taking >0 to 1000 mu g/d ICS (beclomethasone dipropionate-chlorofluorocarbone equivalent) with women taking >1000 mu g/d and those not taking ICSs. The main outcome measures were all and major congenital malformations. Results: We identified 1257 infants with a congenital malformation (9.5%) and 782 infants with a major malformation (5.9%). We found that women who used >1000 mu g/d ICS (n = 154) were significantly more likely (63%) to have a baby with a malformation than the 4392 women who used >0 to 1000 mu g/d (adjusted risk ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02-2.60). On the other hand, women who used >0 to 1000 mu g/d were not found to be more at risk than women who did not use ICSs during the first trimester (n = 8734). Nonsignificant trends of similar magnitude were found for major malformations. Conclusions: Our study adds evidence on the safety of low-to-moderate doses of ICS taken during the first trimester but raises concerns about high doses. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of residual confounding by severity in this association. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124:1229-34.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据