4.7 Article

Localization of Fluoride and Aluminum in Subcellular Fractions of Tea Leaves and Roots

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 2313-2319

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf4038437

关键词

fluoride and aluminum; subcellular localization; detoxification; tea plants

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071158, 31272254]
  2. Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Anhui Province [1408085J01]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [nycytx-26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tea plant is a fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) hyperaccumulator. High concentrations of F and AI have always been found in tea leaves without symptoms of toxicity, which may be related to the special localization of F and Al in tea leaves. In this study, we for the first time determined the subcellular localization of F and Al in tea roots and leaves and provided evidence of the detoxification mechanisms of high concentrations of F and Al in tea plants. Results revealed that 52.3 and 71.8% of the total F accumulated in the soluble fraction of tea roots and leaves, and vacuoles contained 98.1% of the total F measured in the protoplasts of tea leaves. Cell walls contained 69.8 and 75.2% of the total Al detected in the tea roots and leaves, respectively, and 73.2% of Al sequestered in cell walls was immobilized by pectin and hemicellulose components. Meanwhile, 88.3% of the Al measured in protoplasts was stored in the vacuoles of tea leaves. Our results suggested that the subcellular distributions of F and Al in tea plants play two important roles in the detoxification of F and Al toxicities. First, most of the F and Al was sequestered in the vacuole fractions in tea leaves, which could reduce their toxicities to organelles. Second, Al can be immobilized in the pectin and hemicellulose components of cell walls, which could suppress the uptake of Al by tea roots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据